Gita, lesson 16: belief isn't knowledge, and the Veda as a mirror of the Self

For Dayananda, believing isn't knowing: Vedānta presents itself as a means of knowledge, and the teaching is said to work as a mirror of the Self.

· 2 min read · Sources

The Meditation of Sage Viśvāmitra, Raja Ravi Varma, 1897
The Meditation of Sage Viśvāmitra, Raja Ravi Varma, 1897. Credit: public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

In 1 minute

  • Dayananda distinguishes belief — faith that goes unexamined — from knowledge obtained through a valid means.
  • According to him, the Veda only applies where other means fall short, and it cannot contradict direct experience.
  • The Self is the subject of all experience; it is therefore said to be recognized, not experienced, with teaching acting as a mirror.
0:00Read the full article
Chapter 16 of 21PreviousNext chapter

Full article

Believing something and knowing something are not the same thing, and confusing the two can be costly. That is the opening of the sixteenth chapter in Swami Dayananda Saraswati's series, which sets out to show why Vedānta, the Indian school of reflection on Being, considers itself a field of knowledge rather than faith.

Believing isn't knowing

Dayananda calls belief whatever does not go through any valid means of knowledge, such as perception, inference, or logic. He does not condemn belief, but asks that one know when one is believing. He is especially critical of ideas that only hold up if reason is switched off at that point, as though it had been given a local anesthetic.

A means of knowledge with limits

In the tradition, a pramāṇa is a legitimate means of obtaining knowledge. There is perception, inference, analogy, perception of absence, and verbal testimony, which includes the Veda, India's oldest body of texts. For Dayananda, the Veda only applies where the other means fall short, such as questions about liberation, duty, or the nature of the Self. He recalls the position attributed to Śaṅkara, the medieval Vedānta thinker: if a text claimed that fire is cold, it would have to be rejected.

The mirror

The chapter also criticizes instructions according to which one must stare at a fixed point, follow a light, or meditate until one "sees" the Self. The Self is said to be the subject of all experience, and so it cannot be an object that is seen. Just as eyes can only see themselves in a mirror, Vedic teaching is said to work as a mirror that reflects the Self. Whoever uses a mirror first checks that it is accurate, then forgets about it to look at themselves.

Hence the conclusion that self-knowledge is not an experience but a recognition. And that, since the destination is the seeker themselves, it makes no sense to ask "what do I get out of this" in terms of ordinary usefulness.

The complete study is in the book A Essência do Bhagavad Gītā (The Essence of the Bhagavad Gita), by Swami Dayananda Saraswati.

Sources and references for this article

A Essência do Bhagavad Gītā (The Essence of the Bhagavad Gita), Swami Dayananda Saraswati (book)

Translated from Portuguese. This article was rewritten from a post on the original blog, in Portuguese. Read the original

Next chapter · 17/21Gita, lesson 17: why Vedānta calls for a teacher and a traditionContinue the series

Get the best articles of the week

One email a week, no spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read next